Roger Ebert's Enduring Disappointment with 'The Thing'
The legendary film critic Roger Ebert, known for his discerning taste and influential reviews, had a particular soft spot for sci-fi and horror. Yet, there was one 1982 film that he never seemed to warm up to: John Carpenter's 'The Thing'. Despite its cult following and critical acclaim, Ebert remained steadfast in his dislike, even decades after its release. This article delves into the reasons behind Ebert's enduring disappointment with 'The Thing', exploring the film's reception, its themes, and the personal perspectives of those involved.
A Film of Two Opinions
'The Thing' is a loose adaptation of John W. Campbell's novella 'Who Goes There?', with the first film coming in 1951 as 'The Thing From Another World'. The 1982 version, directed by John Carpenter, is known for its intense horror and special effects. However, Ebert's review was less than glowing, criticizing the characters' superficiality and implausible behavior. He described it as 'a great barf-bag movie', a phrase that stuck and became a part of the film's lore.
Ebert's review was not without its merits. He acknowledged the film's transgressive nature and its use of special effects, but he struggled to find depth in the characters' decisions. The critic's lack of patience for the characters' irrational behavior was a recurring theme in his reviews, and 'The Thing' was no exception. The film's portrayal of paranoia and its exploration of the monster within were seemingly lost on Ebert, who focused on the characters' superficiality.
A Missed Opportunity for Horror
One of the most intriguing aspects of Ebert's review is his comparison of 'The Thing' to Ridley Scott's 'Alien'. He claimed that 'Alien' had been done before, better, and used it as an example of a superior sci-fi horror film. This is particularly interesting given that Ebert later awarded 'Alien' a perfect four stars, recognizing its impact on the genre. The contrast between his initial dismissiveness and later praise highlights the subjective nature of film criticism and the evolution of Ebert's own tastes.
The Impact of 'E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial'
Ebert's mixed feelings about 'The Thing' may also be influenced by the film's release year. The same year, 1982, saw the release of Steven Spielberg's 'E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial', a massive commercial success that dominated the box office. 'The Thing', with its darker tone and less commercial appeal, may have been overshadowed by the more family-friendly 'E.T.', leading to a less favorable reception.
A Cult Classic's Legacy
Despite Ebert's lack of appreciation, 'The Thing' has endured as a cult classic. Its intense horror, special effects, and exploration of paranoia have resonated with audiences and critics alike. The film's impact on the horror genre and its influence on later films cannot be overstated. While Ebert's review may have been dismissive, it is clear that 'The Thing' has left a lasting impression on the world of cinema.
In conclusion, Roger Ebert's enduring disappointment with 'The Thing' highlights the subjective nature of film criticism. What may be a missed opportunity for one critic can become a cult classic for another. The film's exploration of paranoia and its intense horror have ensured its place in the annals of sci-fi and horror cinema, regardless of Ebert's personal views.
